The Topic of Buoyancy as Research Box for Pupils

Volkmar Putz, Renate Grof, Ingrid Hantschk

Abstract


This paper focuses on the research based development and arrangement of a so - called interactive research box on the topic of buoyancy and evaluates if pupils can be lead to inquiry - based learning by physical experiments. A “research box” is an interactive exhibit comprising the implementation and evaluation of experiments, where visitors (here mostly pupils from 9 - 12 years) are not only encouraged to activity but also to reflection. The development is done with regard to design and suitability as learning environment. Evaluation of the exhibit is done by participant observation of pupils. Thereby a prolonged cogn itive engagement with the physical content of the exhibit becomes apparent.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, S. (2004). Designs for learning. Studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain. Science Education, 88 (S1), pp. 17-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.20016

Allen, S. & Gutwill, J. (2004). Designing With Multiple Interactives. Five Common Pitfalls. The Museum Journal, 47(2), pp. 199–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00117.x

Altrichter, H. & Posch, P. (2007). Lehrerinnen und Lehrer erforschen ihren Unterricht. Unterrichtsentwicklung und Unterrichtsevaluation durch Aktionsforschung (4th ed.). Bad Heilbrunn: Julius Klinkhardt. p. 138.

Atteslander, P. (2003): Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG. p. 103.

Borun, M. & Dritsas, J. (1997). Developing Family-Friendly Exhibits. The Museum Journal, 40(3), pp. 178–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.1997.tb01302.x

Caulton, T. (1998). Hands-on exhibitions. Managing interactive museums and science centres. London: Routledge.

Csikszentmihaly, M. & Hermanson, K. (1995). Intrinsic motivation in museums: Why does one want to learn? Public institutions for personal learning. Establishing a research agenda, pp. 67–77. Washington, D.C.

Franz-Pittner, Andrea; Grabner, Silvia; Bachmann, Gerhild (2011): Die neue Science Center Didaktik – individuelle Denkprozesse, phänomenorientierte Inszenierungen und dialogische Interaktivität. Science Center Didaktik. Forschendes Lernen in der Elementarpädagogik. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag, pp. 11-18.

Gutwill-Wise, J., Soler, C., Allen, S., Wong, D. & Rezny, S. (2000). Revealing bodies summative evaluation. San Francisco: Exploratorium edition. www.exploratorium.edu/partner/evaluation.html

McLean, K. (1996). Planning for people in museum exhibitions. Washington, DC: Association of Science- Technology Centers. p. 96.

McLean, K. (2003). Visitor Voices. Journal of Museum Education, 28(3), pp. 3–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2003.11510482

Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things (Revised and expanded edition). New York: Basic Books.

Pearce, M. (2003). “They said that the glass is full of friendship”: Visitor stories in a memory exhibition. Journal of Museum Education, 28(3), pp. 26–30.

Perry, D. L. & Tisdal, C. (2004). Going APE! at the Explaoratorium. Interim Summative Evaluation Report. Exploratorium edition. San Francisco. https://www.exploratorium.edu/pdf/going-ape-exploratorium-interim-summative-evaluation-report


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Wolkmar Putz, Renate Grof, Ingrid Hantschk